|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpc.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. |
Data corrente: |
01/10/2008 |
Data da última atualização: |
31/05/2023 |
Autoria: |
ADEBOWALE, E. A.; NAKASHIMA, Y. |
Afiliação: |
Iwate univ., fac. agriculture, Morioka, JAPON. |
Título: |
Rumen degradation of some leguminosae and graminae roughages: effect of chemical pre-treatment with or without cellulase preparation on dry matter and cell wall disappearance. |
Ano de publicação: |
1992 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Animal Feed Science and Technology, v. 38, n. 2/3, p. 219-235, 1992. |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(92)90104-E |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Abstract: Roughages (cowpea husk, maize stover, orchard grass hay and rice straw), which have similar contents of lignin, acid detergent fibre and cellulose, were chemically pretreated with either 50 g NaOH or 50 g alkaline (NaOH) solution of hydrogen peroxide kg−1 dry matter (DM) with or without 5 g cellulase kg−1 DM. Cell wall neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and silica content of the legume increased while those of the grasses solubilised on treatment with NaOH or sequential treatment of NaOH and cellulase. Samples of each preparation were incubated in polyester bags in the rumens of three sheep to estimate degradability. The data were described using the equation p = a + b (1 − e−ct)where p is degradability at time (t) and a, b and c are constants. All roughages were extensively solubilised in water after chemical treatment, and further solubilised by subsequent cellulase treatment (P < 0.05). Cellulase preparation significantly reduced (P < 0.05) lag time during which microbes colonized the cell wall particles. When time effects in fermentation were compared, they were significant (P < 0.01). Sequential treatment of NaOH and then cellulase was the most effective and increased dry matter and cell wall degradability in the graminaceous plant materials (particularly rice straw) more than the legume (P < 0.05). The rate of degradation (constantc) was faster for the legume (14.5% h−1) than for the grasses (approximately 4.2% h−1) (P < 0.01). NDF and DM degradability, silica and DM degradability, hemicellulose and cell wall degradability were positively correlated for cowpea husk (r from + 0.52 to + 0.84), but negatively correlated for all graminaceous roughages (r from −0.46 to −0.99). MenosAbstract: Roughages (cowpea husk, maize stover, orchard grass hay and rice straw), which have similar contents of lignin, acid detergent fibre and cellulose, were chemically pretreated with either 50 g NaOH or 50 g alkaline (NaOH) solution of hydrogen peroxide kg−1 dry matter (DM) with or without 5 g cellulase kg−1 DM. Cell wall neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and silica content of the legume increased while those of the grasses solubilised on treatment with NaOH or sequential treatment of NaOH and cellulase. Samples of each preparation were incubated in polyester bags in the rumens of three sheep to estimate degradability. The data were described using the equation p = a + b (1 − e−ct)where p is degradability at time (t) and a, b and c are constants. All roughages were extensively solubilised in water after chemical treatment, and further solubilised by subsequent cellulase treatment (P < 0.05). Cellulase preparation significantly reduced (P < 0.05) lag time during which microbes colonized the cell wall particles. When time effects in fermentation were compared, they were significant (P < 0.01). Sequential treatment of NaOH and then cellulase was the most effective and increased dry matter and cell wall degradability in the graminaceous plant materials (particularly rice straw) more than the legume (P < 0.05). The rate of degradation (constantc) was faster for the legume (14.5% h−1) than for the grasses (approximately 4.2% h−1) (P < 0.01). NDF and DM degradability, silica and... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Cinética; Degradabilidade; Forrageira; Roughages; Tratamiento enzimático; Tratamiento químico. |
Thesagro: |
Arroz; Celulase; Composição Química; Enzima; Fibra; Gramínea; Leguminosa; Milho; Nutrição Animal; Rúmen; Soja. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Animal feeding; Cellulases; Chemical composition; Sheep feeding. |
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
Marc: |
LEADER 02922naa a2200397 a 4500 001 1534650 005 2023-05-31 008 1992 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(92)90104-E$2DOI 100 1 $aADEBOWALE, E. A. 245 $aRumen degradation of some leguminosae and graminae roughages$beffect of chemical pre-treatment with or without cellulase preparation on dry matter and cell wall disappearance.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c1992 520 $aAbstract: Roughages (cowpea husk, maize stover, orchard grass hay and rice straw), which have similar contents of lignin, acid detergent fibre and cellulose, were chemically pretreated with either 50 g NaOH or 50 g alkaline (NaOH) solution of hydrogen peroxide kg−1 dry matter (DM) with or without 5 g cellulase kg−1 DM. Cell wall neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and silica content of the legume increased while those of the grasses solubilised on treatment with NaOH or sequential treatment of NaOH and cellulase. Samples of each preparation were incubated in polyester bags in the rumens of three sheep to estimate degradability. The data were described using the equation p = a + b (1 − e−ct)where p is degradability at time (t) and a, b and c are constants. All roughages were extensively solubilised in water after chemical treatment, and further solubilised by subsequent cellulase treatment (P < 0.05). Cellulase preparation significantly reduced (P < 0.05) lag time during which microbes colonized the cell wall particles. When time effects in fermentation were compared, they were significant (P < 0.01). Sequential treatment of NaOH and then cellulase was the most effective and increased dry matter and cell wall degradability in the graminaceous plant materials (particularly rice straw) more than the legume (P < 0.05). The rate of degradation (constantc) was faster for the legume (14.5% h−1) than for the grasses (approximately 4.2% h−1) (P < 0.01). NDF and DM degradability, silica and DM degradability, hemicellulose and cell wall degradability were positively correlated for cowpea husk (r from + 0.52 to + 0.84), but negatively correlated for all graminaceous roughages (r from −0.46 to −0.99). 650 $aAnimal feeding 650 $aCellulases 650 $aChemical composition 650 $aSheep feeding 650 $aArroz 650 $aCelulase 650 $aComposição Química 650 $aEnzima 650 $aFibra 650 $aGramínea 650 $aLeguminosa 650 $aMilho 650 $aNutrição Animal 650 $aRúmen 650 $aSoja 653 $aCinética 653 $aDegradabilidade 653 $aForrageira 653 $aRoughages 653 $aTratamiento enzimático 653 $aTratamiento químico 700 1 $aNAKASHIMA, Y. 773 $tAnimal Feed Science and Technology$gv. 38, n. 2/3, p. 219-235, 1992.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos (CNPC) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registros recuperados : 2 | |
1. | | PHILLIPS, H. R. P.; BACH, E. M.; BARTZ, M. L. C.; BENNETT, J. M.; BEUGNON, R.; BRIONES, M. J. I.; BROWN, G. G.; FERLIAN, O.; GONGALSKY, K. B.; GUERRA, C. A.; KÖNIG-RIES, B.; KREBS, J. J.; ORGIAZZI, A.; RAMIREZ, K. S.; RUSSELL, D. J.; SCHWARZ, B.; WALL, D. H.; BROSE, U.; DECAËNS, T.; LAVELLE, P.; LOREAU, M.; MATHIEU, J.; MULDER, C.; VAN DER PUTTEN, W. H.; RILLIG, M. C.; THAKUR, M. P.; VRIES, F. T. de; WARDLE, D. A.; AMMER, C.; AMMER, S.; ARAI, M.; AYUKE, F. O.; BAKER, G. H.; BARETTA, D.; BARKUSKY, D.; BEAUSÉJOUR, R.; BEDANO, J. C.; BIRKHOFER, K.; BLANCHART, E.; BLOSSEY, B.; BOLGER, T.; BRADLEY, R. L.; BROSSARD, M.; BURTIS, J. C.; CAPOWIEZ, Y.; CAVAGNARO, T. R.; CHOI, A.; CLAUSE, J.; CLUZEAU, D.; COORS, A.; CROTTY, F. V.; CRUMSEY, J. M.; DÁVALOS, A.; COSÍN; DOBSON, A. M.; DOMÍNGUEZ, A.; DUHOUR, A. E.; VAN EEKEREN, N.; EMMERLING, C.; FALCO, L. B.; FERNÁNDEZ, R.; FONTE, S. J.; FRAGOSO, C.; FRANCO, A. L. C.; FUSILERO, A.; GERASKINA, A. P.; GHOLAMI, S.; GONZÁLEZ, G.; GUNDALE, M. J.; LÓPEZ, M. G.; HACKENBERGER, B. K.; HACKENBERGER, D. K.; HERNÁNDEZ, L. M.; HIRTH, J. R.; HISHI, T.; HOLDSWORTH, A. R.; HOLMSTRUP, M.; HOPFENSPERGER, K. N.; LWANGA, E. H.; HUHTA, V.; HURISSO, T. T.; IANNONE III, B. V.; IORDACHE, M.; IRMLER, U.; IVASK, M.; JESÚS, J. B.; JOHNSON-MAYNARD, J. L.; JOSCHKO, M.; KANEKO, N.; KANIANSKA, R.; KEITH, A. M.; KERNECKER, M. L.; KONÉ, A. W.; KOOCH, Y.; KUKKONEN, S. T.; LALTHANZARA, H.; LAMMEL, D. R.; LEBEDEV, I. M.; LE CADRE. E.; LINCOLN, N. K.; LÓPEZ-HERNÁNDEZ, D.; LOSS, S. R.; MARICHAL, R.; MATULA, R.; MINAMIYA, Y.; MOOS, J. H.; MORENO, G.; MORÓN-RÍOS, A.; MOTOHIRO, H.; MUYS, B.; NEIRYNCK, J.; NORGROVE, L.; NOVO, M.; NUUTINEN, V.; NUZZO, V.; RAHMAN, P. M.; PANSU, J.; PAUDEL, S.; PÉRÈS, G.; PÉREZ CAMACHO, L.; PONGE, J.-F.; PRIETZEL, J.; RAPOPORT, I. B.; RASHID, M. I.; REBOLLO, S.; RODRÍGUEZ, M. A.; ROTH, A. M.; ROUSSEAU, G. X.; ROZEN, A.; SAYAD, E.; VAN SCHAIK, L.; SCHARENBROCH, B.; SCHIRRMANN, M.; SCHMIDT, O.; SCHRÖDER, B.; SEEBER, J.; SHASHKOV, M. P.; SINGH, J.; SMITH, S. M.; STEINWANDTER, M.; SZLAVECZ, K.; TALAVERA, J. A.; TRIGO, D.; TSUKAMOTO, J.; URIBE-LÓPEZ, S.; VALENÇA, A. W. de; VIRTO, I.; WACKETT, A. A.; WARREN, M. W.; WEBSTER, E. R.; WEHR, N. H.; WHALEN, J. K.; WIRONEN, M. B.; WOLTERS, V.; WU, P.; ZENKOVA, I. V.; ZHANG, W.; CAMERON, E. K.; EISENHAUER, N. Global data on earthworm abundance, biomass, diversity and corresponding environmental properties. Scientific Data, v. 8, n. 136, 2021. 12 p.Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
2. | | PHILLIPS, H. R. P.; GUERRA, C. A.; BARTZ, M. L. C.; BRIONES, M. J. I.; BROWN, G. G.; CROWTHER, T. W.; FERLIAN, O.; GONGALSKY, K. B.; VAN DEN HOOGEN, J.; KREBS, J.; ORGIAZZI, A.; ROUTH, D.; SCHWARZ, B.; BACH, E. M.; BENNETT, J.; BROSE, U.; DECAËNS, T.; KÖNIG-RIES, B.; LOREAU, M.; MATHIEU, J.; MULDER, C.; VAN DER PUTTEN, W. H.; RAMIREZ, K. S.; RILLIG, M. C.; RUSSELL, D.; RUTGERS, M.; THAKUR, M. P.; VRIES, F. T. de; WALL, D. H.; WARDLE, D. A.; ARAI, M.; AYUKE, F. O.; BAKER, G. H.; BEAUSÉJOUR, R.; BEDANO, J. C.; BIRKHOFER, K.; BLANCHART, E.; BLOSSEY, B.; BOLGER, T.; BRADLEY, R. L.; CALLAHAM, M. A.; CAPOWIEZ, Y.; CAULFIELD, M. E.; CHOI, A.; CROTTY, F. V.; DÁVALOS, A.; DIAZ COSIN, D. J.; DOMINGUEZ, A.; ESTEBAN DUHOUR, A.; VAN EEKEREN, N.; EMMERLING, C.; FALCO, L. B.; FERNÁNDEZ, R.; FONTE, S. J.; FRAGOSO, C.; FRANCO, A. L. C.; FUGÈRE, M.; FUSILERO, A. T.; GHOLAMI, S.; GUNDALE, M. J.; GUTIÉRREZ LÓPEZ, M.; HACKENBERGER, D. K.; HERNÁNDEZ, L. M.; HISHI, T.; HOLDSWORTH, A. R.; HOLMSTRUP, M.; HOPFENSPERGER, K. N.; HUERTA LWANGA, E.; HUHTA, V.; HURISSO, T. T.; IANNONE III, B. V.; IORDACHE, M.; JOSCHKO, M.; KANEKO, N.; KANIANSKA, R.; KEITH, A. M.; KELLY, C. A.; KERNECKER, M. L.; KLAMINDER, J.; KONÉ, A. W.; KOOCH, Y.; KUKKONEN, S. T.; LALTHANZARA, H.; LAMMEL, D. R.; LEBEDEV, I. M.; LI, Y.; JESUS LIDON, J. B.; LINCOLN, N. K.; LOSS, S. R.; MARICHAL, R.; MATULA, R.; MOOS, J. H.; MORENO, G.; MORÓN-RÍOS, A.; MUYS, B.; NEIRYNCK, J.; NORGROVE, L.; NOVO, M.; NUUTINEN, V.; NUZZO, V.; MUJEEB RAHMAN, P.; PANSU, J.; PAUDEL, S.; PÉRÈS, G.; PÉREZ-CAMACHO, L.; PIÑEIRO, R.; PONGE, J.-F.; RASHID, M. I.; REBOLLO, S.; RODEIRO-IGLESIAS, J.; RODRÍGUEZ, M. Á.; ROTH, A. M.; ROUSSEAU, G. X.; ROZEN, A.; SAYAD, E.; VAN SCHAIK, L.; SCHARENBROCH, B. C.; SCHIRRMANN, M.; SCHMIDT, O.; SCHRÖDER, B.; SEEBER, J.; SHASHKOV, M. P.; SINGH, J.; SMITH, S. M.; STEINWANDTER, M.; TALAVERA, J. A.; TRIGO, D.; TSUKAMOTO, J.; VALENÇA, A. W. de; VANEK, S. J.; VIRTO, I.; WACKETT, A. A.; WARREN, M. W.; WEHR, N. H.; WHALEN, J. K.; WIRONEN, M. B.; WOLTERS, V.; ZENKOVA, I. V.; ZHANG, W.; CAMERON, E. K.; EISENHAUER, N. Global distribution of earthworm diversity. Science, v. 366, n. 6464, p. 480-485, Oct. 2019.Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: A - 1 |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 2 | |
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|